Brewers Extend Chase Anderson


The Brewers announced a contract extension with Chase Anderson on Tuesday that locks up his next two arbitration years, replaces his final arbitration year with a club option, and gives the Brewers a club option for what would have been his first year after free agency. Here is the breakdown, per Adam McCalvy:

Signing Bonus: $1 million

2018: $4.25 million

2019: $6 million

2019: $8.5 million club option with $500,000 buyout

2020: $9.5 million club option with $500,000 buyout

The deal is a nothing short of a coup for the Brewers, as they gained the rights to buy a year of Anderson’s free agency for significantly below market value, without committing to any extra money or years. In return Anderson gets to lock in his next two annual salaries. That is some well-deserved financial security for the man who, at least for the time being, looks to be the 2018 opening day starter.

Anderson, like many of his teammates, had a breakout campaign in 2017. He posted a career-low 2.74 ERA. He struck out 23.4% of the batters he faced, a 5% increase over 2016. He walked fewer batters than his past two seasons, and saw a sharp decrease in the home runs he’s allowed. If he can keep up those numbers and stay healthy, the Brewers will have just inked one of the most valuable contracts in baseball. Is that feasible, though?

The short answer is probably not. A sub-3.00 ERA is Cy Young-level results. I don’t think anyone thinks that Anderson suddenly became a perennial Cy Young candidate at 29 years old. That said, we shouldn’t be fooled into thinking that Anderson’s 2017 was a fluke.

An ERA in the low-to-mid 3’s isn’t an unrealistic expectation. Since his rookie season, Anderson has added 2 full mph to his fastball. He’s developed the quality of, and his confidence in, both his cutter and his curveball. Each pitch saw a 5% increase in usage last season, with the cutter supplementing his 4-seamer and sinker, and the curveball giving him another off-speed option to mix with the change. The increased confidence in those pitches kept the hitters guessing, and kept them from sitting on the 4-seamer. That’s probably a big reason why he allowed so many fewer home runs, despite the record number of home runs across Major League Baseball.

Anderson’s improvement is real, and the only thing I’d really be concerned about is his ability to stay on the field as he’s never thrown 155 innings in a season. The Brewers got a very good player to agree to sign to a very team friendly contract. I’m happy for Anderson, but a little puzzled as to why his agent couldn’t get a better deal for his client. At the very least, they should have locked in his 3rd year of arbitration, or made the value of his 4th year option closer to what he could be looking at in the open market. He was in line to hit free agency before his age-33 season. Now he’ll either hit free agency for his age-34 season, or as damaged goods, having just been bought out. Signing this extension lowers his potential future earnings significantly.

Anderson’s extension is the first of what could be many extensions handed out by Milwaukee this winter. Travis Shaw, Domingo Santana, Corey Knebel, and even Orlando Arcia could be signing long term agreements with the club. Anderson is also the first of several pitching additions the Brewers could be making this offseason. With Jimmy Nelson set to miss most, if not all, of the 2018 season, the Brewers will probably be making some splashes in the free agency and trade markets to bolster their rotation and bullpen. This was an offseason starting point that Brewers fans should be very pleased with.







Thanks to Fantasy Pros and Fan Duel, I am once again competing in the Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup in 2016. Each week, myself and 44 other daily fantasy writers compete in a Fan Duel contest for actual cash money. Our scores are totaled, along the way, and by the All-Star Break we’ll have decided which writer gives the most accurate advice. Each week, I am posting my lineups here on Brewer Rat, along with some analysis

If this looks like fun, and you’d like to give DFS a try, click here and tell them I sent you.

My lineup did well two weeks ago, and finished middle of the pack last week (thanks for nothing Aaron Nola). Currently I’m sitting and I’ve moved up to 16th in the overall DFAC rankings. Will you look at that.

You can see my lineup for this week above.

I’m imagining Felix and Scherzer will be highly owned tonight, but I hated their price (and Scherzer’s matchup) with so many big name bats in good situations tonight. unfortunately, even by saving money with Tanaka, I still couldn’t get most of the bats I coveted (Ortiz (not even starting anymore), Posey, Goldschmidt, Arenado, Desmond… Oh well. My team ain’t bad today.

I’m loving Beltre despite the wind, and Chris Carter against a struggling John Lamb, even if the roof is closed. Mostly, though, I like Crawford and Tomas and Calhoun’s matchups.

On second thought, I’m not very confident in tonight’s lineup. Wins are incredibly important for pitchers, and since he’s facing Chris Archer, Tanaka is far from a lock to win tonight. Beyond that, I had to bargain shop enough as it is, that I might as well have gone all out with Felix and filled out the rest of my lineup with quad-A guys facing quad-A pitchers. Whatever, good luck tonight, hope you fare better than I do.




Thanks to Fantasy Pros and Fan Duel, I am once again competing in the Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup in 2016. Each week, myself and 44 other daily fantasy writers compete in a Fan Duel contest for actual cash money. Our scores are totaled, along the way, and by the All-Star Break we’ll have decided which writer gives the most accurate advice. Each week, I am posting my lineups here on Brewer Rat, along with some analysis

If this looks like fun, and you’d like to give DFS a try, click here and tell them I sent you.

My lineup did well last week, led by Jeff Samardzija, Corey Seager, and Jason Heyward. I finished 13th on the week, and I’ve moved up to 20th in the overall DFAC rankings.

You can see my lineup above.

There are a lot of upper-tier pitchers starting tonight. Strasburg, Kluber, Felix, Tanaka, Smyly, and Matz are all taking the hill. Outside of Kluber, though, I didn’t like any of their matchups that much, at least not at that price. Instead, I went a cheaper route, and took Aaron Sanchez. He’s going against Smyly, so a win isn’t a sure bet, but Tampa Bay’s offense is miserable. They’re in the bottom 5 of both strikeouts per game and runs per game. Sanchez was roughed up at home last time out, but this time he’ll pitch in one of the most run-suppressing ballparks in the league.

Beyond Sanchez, I wanted to get some shares of righties against Adam Morgan in Philly. Yan Gomes has not hit well this season, and his price reflects that a bit, but that’s almost entirely because of his performance against RHP. Against lefties, he has a .308 AVG and .231 ISO. Sure, it’s a small sample, but his career wOBA against lefties is .340, so this isn’t a fluke.

Gomes isn’t the only Indian I took, though. I’ll also be playing Francisco Lindor, and his career .914 OPS against lefties.

Last week I predicted that Bud Norris would get punished by left-handed Mets’ bats. I was right, except that all the damage came from Curtis Granderson, while I rostered Lucas Duda and Michael Conforto. This week, the Mets take on Jake Peavy. Peavy has been hit significantly harder by lefties than righties throughout his career, and this year he looks as washed up as ever.

The Rockies aren’t at home, but playing in hitter-friendly Arizona shouldn’t stop you from picking on Tyler Chatwood. Lamb only gets to play so often as a platoon player, but in 87 plate appearances, he sports a .297 AVG and a wonderful .257 ISO.

I filled in the rest of my outfield with a pricey, stat-collecting juggernaut named Ryan Braun, and an underpriced Gregory Polanco in the midst of a breakout campaign. Braun’s hitting .352 with 5 HR and a .268 ISO. Polanco’s reverse splits actually make him a bit of a risk, but  it’s tough to find more talent at that price.

To round out my lineup I grabbed Chase Utley. Chase is cheap, and always good for a few points. I would have preferred to spend less here, but I didn’t like many of the options.

I’ll surely grab some shares of Kluber in other lineups, but I like Sanchez tonight. It’s a calculated risk taking Sanchez instead of Kluber, so hopefully it pays off. Good Luck, and hopefully this will help your lineup pay off for you as well.

The Discipline of Patience and Selectivity


This is what you call being late to the party. I was going to write about the Brewers’ new-found patience at the plate. I was gonna note that while they’re taking more pitches outside the zone, they’re also taking more pitches inside the zone. I was going to note that the phrase, “taking pitches” should really be used to describe swinging at a pitch. I mean, if you’re choosing which pitch to hit, and you say, “I’ll take that,” most people would assume you mean, “I’d like to swing at that pitch.” But I couldn’t figure out how to frame it in a way that didn’t come off as me dumping all over the new approach. I was also busy. So I waited.

While I waited, Steven Jewell wrote about it. Then, Steve Altstadt wrote about it, as did did Travis, amongst others. It’s fair to say that this is the topic du jour in Brewer circles. It’s also fair to say that I’m wildly late to this party, and even though I’ve brought pizza as a peace offering, Papa Johns was the only place that was open, and everyone’s already asleep, anyway.

20160423_151337The Brewers offense has a different feel for it in 2016. They are much more patient at the plate, taking far more pitches than fans had become accustomed to in recent years, and drawing far more walks. As everyone already noted, though, the Brewers are not just taking more balls, they’re taking more strikes, too. So, let’s be clear about a few things:

First, there are two basic aspects of Plate Discipline – Patience and Pitch Selection. These are two very different things, even if they often work hand-in-hand. The ideal hitter does both well. Patience is a strategy that can be employed one game to the next, while Pitch Selection is a skill that takes years of practice to hone, and a natural discerning eye to truly master. So, when Scooter Gennett goes from 12 walks in 391 PA last year to 9 walks in 55 PA, it’s an overnight change in strategy, not an improved eye at the plate.

That brings us to the second point. This is an obvious strategy change that the coaches have employed. They’ve instructed their hitters, especially Gennett and Santana, to take more pitches; those hitters didn’t just work hard all offseason at taking pitches, like a dog pretending not to beg for the Papa John’s pizza sitting on the table. Gennett and Santana appear to be more patient, but not necessarily more disciplined, hitters this year.

This is not a bad thing. However, there are some downsides. Taking more pitches means deeper counts and hitting with two strikes a lot. Two-strike counts are not ideal for hitters that lack pitch selection skills or Ryan Braun-ian hand quickness to foul tough pitches off.

Considering how impatient the Brewers, or at least certain Brewers, were last season, the positives seem outweigh the negatives. This is more of a correction than an adjustment. On a macro level, better patience forces higher pitch counts, forcing pitchers out of the game earlier, something the Cardinals have been masterful at for the past decade. On a more micro level, patience forces the pitcher to work closer to the zone when he might prefer otherwise. It keeps him honest and makes him think twice about bouncing his slider in the dirt. It also gives your pitcher more rest between innings, something that could be useful, especially considering the current state of the Brewers’ rotation.

The question becomes this: As pitchers adjust and place more pitches in the zone, will the Brewers bats adjust, or will they watch hittable pitches fly by, and be forced to swing at an out-pitch with two strikes. It’ll be interesting to watch, but for now, let’s just be happy that Scooter and Domingo look like reborn hitters.

Enjoy your crappy, cold pizza, jerks.

DFAC Week 3 Review


After another week of the DFAC, the ship appears to be back on course. My Samardzija pick paid off, as the Giant destroyed the Marlins. The late night win (12 pts) catapulted me into the money. I ended up finishing 13th. It’s my second week finishing in the top third of the field.

If this looks like fun, and you’d like to give DFS a try, click here and tell ’em I sent you.

Along with Samardzija, Stephen Vogt and Jason Heyward had solid outings, while Corey Seager proved to be the right Coors Field play. I’m satisfied with 13th, considering how hastily I threw my lineup together, but I’m a but disappointed with the Mets game. I was expecting the Mets LHHs to tear Bud Norris apart, but I chose the wrong Mets lefties. Duda and Conforto have major power, but they combined for 6 points. Had I gone with Granderson, cheaper than Conforto, I would have finished in 2nd place. Hindsight bias abounds here, but considering my strategy was Mets lefties, I think I reserve the right to be mad at myself. Here’s how my lineup worked out:


Anyway, congrats to Dave Potts for somehow finishing 1st this week, despite not having Granderson in his lineup. Nice work.

Fantasy Pros’ Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup Week 3


Thanks to Fantasy Pros and Fan Duel, I am once again competing in the Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup in 2016. Each week, myself and 44 other daily fantasy writers compete in a Fan Duel contest for actual cash money. Our scores are totaled, along the way, and by the All-Star Break we’ll have decided which writer gives the most accurate advice. Each week, I am posting my lineups here on Brewer Rat, along with some analysis.

Last week was much better than the week before. I finished 15th, the exact bottom of the top third. Carlos Martinez got me a nice bounty of 42 pts for $9,000, and I got 3 HR from Vogt, Pujols, and Gardner. Unfortunately, Trout left me hanging, only scoring 3 points off of Tommy Milone, but I’m happy with a 15th place finish.

I’ll be honest, I threw my lineup together rather hastily this week. That doesn’t mean I don’t like it, but it also doesn’t mean I’ll be entering it in a lot of games tonight, outside of the DFAC. It also means that I’ll rather hastily be putting together my lineup analysis.

Pitcher: Jeff Samardzija – Giants, vs. vs. Marlins

There’s a lot of high quality, high priced pitching starting tonight. Lester is very tempting against the Reds, but at $10,600, I couldn’t pull the trigger in that ballpark. Harvey would make a nice contrarian play, Gio and Wainwright have nice matchups, Corbin, Moore, and Quintana would all make solid plays, but I really like Samardzija’s chances at the W, as he faces off against Cosart.

Catcher: Stephen Vogt – Athletics, @Sanchez

Aaron Sanchez looks great so far, but Vogt’s tough to pass on at $2,800 against a RHP in Toronto.

1st Base: Lucas Duda – Mets, @Norris

Sure, the game is in home run suppressing Atlanta, but Duda crushes RHP (career .226 ISO vs RHP), and Bud Norris is pitching.

2nd Base: Scooter Gennett – Brewers, vs. Nola

Many of the struggles that Nola has had have come against left handed hitters. Scooter is never an ideal play because he weighs about 75 lbs, but he’s been fantastic so far this year, so I’ll try to ride that out.

3rd Base: Todd Frazier – White Sox, vs. Perez

This pick is more about Perez than it is about Frazier. Perez is always a threat to crap the bed. Frazier is one of two home run threats the Sox have, so he’s in my lineup today.

Short Stop: Corey Seager – Dodgers, @J. Gray

I can only assume that other teams will have a lot of shares of this Coors game. I would too, if they weren’t so damn expensive. I’ll probably regret not having more, but I had to have at least one batter here facing Gray in his 2016 debut. Hopefully it’s one that isn’t too highly owned

Outfield – Carlos Gomez – Astros, vs. Wright

Wright is the type of pitcher that Gomez could completely flop against. Gomez thrives off of fastballs, and Wright isn’t gonna bring the speed. However, if he hangs one, Gomez is taking it deep. I think this is a pretty big all-or-nothing play, but it’s a risk worth taking for less than $3,000.

Outfield – Michael Conforto – Mets, @Norris

Conforto’s price is starting to rise, but $3,400 is still to low, especially when he gets to face a RHP like Norris.

Outfield – Jason Heyward – Cubs, @Moscot

More than 75% of Heyward’s home runs have come against righties. He’s not much of a power hitter, but against a pitcher like Moscot that doesn’t induce a ton of groundouts, and in a tiny little stadium like GABP, I’m digging Heyward.

Good Luck tonight!

Fantasy Pros’ Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup Week 2


Thanks to Fantasy Pros and Fan Duel, I am once again competing in the Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup in 2016. Each week, myself and 44 other daily fantasy writers compete in a Fan Duel contest for actual cash money. Our scores are totaled, along the way, and by the All-Star Break we’ll have decided which writer gives the most accurate advice. Each week, I am posting my lineups here on Brewer Rat, along with some analysis.

Last week was a disaster. Liriano threw a disappointing 5 innings, and Brandon Crawford was my only hitter who reached double digits. I wound up placing 40th out of 45, but hey, that first week was unpredictable across the board, so I’m looking to rebound in week 2. Here’s my lineup:

Pitcher: Carlos Martinez – Cardinals, vs. Cin

Once again, I’m taking a pitcher that is facing the Reds and their weird mix of aging veterans and beginning-of-rebuild talent. This time, my pitcher will get to face them outside of Cincy. Lots of great pitching is going tonight, but Martinez should be able to compete with the the best, considering his matchup and ballpark.

Catcher: Stephen Vogt – Athletics, vs. Volquez

Vogt is always a nice cheap play, given his aptitude against right handed pitching. He’s not the best option, but at his price point, he’s head and shoulders above the competition. Given how much great, expensive pitching is going, Vogt should be highly owned tonight.

1st Base: Albert Pujols – Angels, @ Milone

The name of the game is home runs with Pujols tonight. He’ll face a bad left-handed pitcher in Tommy Milone at Target Field. $3,000 is hard to go wrong with here.

2nd Base: Dee Gordon – Marlins, vs. Perez

Williams Perez would not be in the starting rotation on many major league teams, but here he is, starting tonight against the Marlins. I like Gordon’s chances of reaching base tonight, and the Braves have been allowing stolen bases like wild. Opposing teams are 8/9 swiping bases against the Braves. While most of that is an indictment of A.J. Pierzynski, Tyler Flowers hasn’t thrown a runner out yet, either.

3rd Base: Kyle Seager – Mariners, @Severino

I’ll be honest, until the Yankees lineup came out, I had Alex Rodriguez slotted in here. As it turns out, ARod isn’t starting tonight, so I took another underpriced home run threat, in Seager. I’m not huge on his matchup against Severino, but as a low-cost lefty in Yankee Stadium, I doubt I’m the only one playing Seager tonight.

Short Stop: Troy Tulowitzki – Blue Jays, @Porcello

Porcello has had quite a rocky past year or so, and this Blue Jays lineup has the ability to really rattle a pitcher. Tulo launched a line-drive home run last night. He’s heating up, and could knock a couple off of the monster, and hopefully drive a few runs in, and he comes in at just $3,000.

Outfield – Brett Gardner – Yankees, vs. Karns

This one’s pretty simple: Talented lefty vs. RHP in Yankee Stadium. I like Karns, but not tonight.

Outfield – Nomar Mazara – Rangers, vs. Worley

I’m always amazed when I see Vance Worley’s name on the schedule. He hasn’t done much to prove that he’s a viable Major League starter, so I had to take someone on the Rangers. Tonight’s choice is the red hot Mazara at $2,700.

Outfield – Mike Trout – Angels, vs. Milone

Milone’s given up 65 career home runs to RHB, so I chose the Angels two most powerful RHBs. Trout’s $4,900 price tag is hopefully enough to scare other folks off (especially those that chose Kershaw), so I’m really hoping for a big game.

Between Trout and Martinez, the rest of my roster had to be constructed on a budget, but I’m happy with it. Good Luck tonight!

Fantasy Pros’ Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup Week 1


Thanks to Fantasy Pros and Fan Duel, I will once again be competing in the Daily Fantasy Accuracy Cup in 2016. Each week, myself and 44 other daily fantasy writers will compete in a Fan Duel contest for actual cash money. Our scores will be totaled, along the way, and by the All-Star Break we’ll have decided which writer gives the most accurate advice. Each week, I will post my lineups here on Brewer Rat, along with some analysis. Here is my Week 1 lineup:

Pitcher: Francisco Liriano – Pirates, @Cin

Liriano’s high ground ball rate should help protect him from Great American Ballpark’s home run inducing ways. His excellence against lefties will help as well, as Cincinnati’s biggest threats are all left handed (Votto, Bruce, Hamilton).

Catcher: Chris Iannetta – Angels, vs. Surkamp

Iannetta is basically an all-or-nothing play, but what else would you be looking for at Catcher? Stolen bases? vs. Lefties, Iannetta had a .116 wRC+ in 2015. Despite his .230 avg, he still put up a .359 OBP and a .405 SLG against lefties. The hope here is that he gets a double or two and possibly scores a couple runs. Tonight he’ll face lefty, Eric Surkamp, who is not very good.

1st Base: Eric Hosmer – Royals, vs. Santana

Hosmer broke out in a big way last year, and he did it in large part by crushing RHP. He posted a .885 SLG against RHP, and 14 of his 18 homers came against righties. Meanwhile, Ervin Santana has had some major struggles against lefties, so look for Hosmer’s $3,300 price tag to be quite the steal.

2nd Base: Kolten Wong – Cardinals, @Wisler

Wisler has had some struggles against lefties, and Wong pretty much only hits righties, so this seems like a no brainer.

3rd Base: Matt Carpenter – Cardinals, @Wisler

It could be a long night for Wisler, considering how many LHB the Cards can throw at him.

Short Stop: Brandon Crawford – Giants, vs. Stripling

Who is Stripling?

Outfield – Jose Bautista – Blue Jays, vs. Joe Kelly

Joe Kelly posted a HR/FB rate of 19.2% against RHB last season. That should get worse in a hitter’s park like Toronto, against a team of right-handed power hitters like the Blue Jays. Bautista might be the best of that bunch when it comes to hitting RHP (.301 ISO and 35 HR against RHP).

Outfield – Gregory Polanco – Pirates, @Simon

A young player ready to break out, Polanco gets to face a righty like Simon in a small park.

Outfield – Alex Gordon – Royals, vs. Santana

Alex Gordon’s injury cost him some time last season, but don’ t let the shortened season fool you. A healthy Gordon dominates right-handed pitching. The Royals lefties will get to pull the ball at Miguel Sano, as he tries to navigate that gigantic outfield in KC.

The Evolution of Yovani Gallardo


Yovani Gallardo has always been a bit of an enigma. For the years between Ben Sheets/CC Sabathia and Zack Greinke, Gallardo was the Brewers de facto ace. He was a very good pitcher during that time, but he could never get over that proverbial hump and become elite. He showed flashes of brilliance, reaching back and firing his fastball up to 95 mph, followed by a hammer curve that just fell out of the sky. We all remember those dominant games. I, personally can remember sitting on the first base line when he pitched a 1-0 shutout, where he also hit a home run to score the game’s only run.

Those dominant games weren’t enough to define his career, though. His game logs were always peppered with 5 inning outings. As much potential as Gallardo had, he simply threw too many pitches in too many games. He made the most of those innings, but he was so reliant on the strikeout, or perhaps so afraid of contact, that he’d rack up 100+ pitches before making it to the 6th inning, rarely giving the bullpen a day to rest.

Now that he’s reportedly agreed to a 3 year deal with the Baltimore Orioles in the $40-$45 million guaranteed range, Gallardo is drawing mixed reactions once again. Many think he’s a talented, reliable pitcher, who’s not yet in the twilight of his career, while others think 3 years is far too long of a commitment for a pitcher with a declining skill set.

Since the true answer almost always lies somewhere in between, let’s take a look at how Gallardo has matured over the years.

The most common critique from his detractors is that he’s no longer the flame thrower that he once was. This is a serious problem for Gallardo, whose velocity was used not only used to punch batters out, but was also vital in setting up his dangerous curveball. Let’s look at his declining velocity a bit closer.

Gallardo's velocity is clearly in decline

Gallardo’s velocity is clearly in decline

That’s not exactly the trend you want to see. Gallardo has lost 2 full mph from his average four-seam fastball since 2011. For a pitcher that relies on strikeouts, that’s can be a major problem, so how has it affected his results?


Just as you likely expected, Gallardo’s K:9 has dropped dramatically. We’re talking about nearly 10 strikeouts per nine innings to below 6. There’s obviously a direct correlation with his drop in velocity here, and this is precisely the reason many fans are lukewarm on Gallardo going forward. However, when we start to look at his other results, things get a bit curious.


Gallardo’s ERA has been remarkably consistent. Considering how far his fastball velocity and strikeout rate have fallen, a consistent ERA is counter-intuitive, to say the least. As a matter of fact, Gallardo’s ERA has actually gotten better as he’s gotten used to his new, reduced velocity. In his last two seasons, he’s posted the lowest ERAs of his career.

What’s going on here? How is he allowing fewer runs, despite what appears to be a declining skill set? Many will note that he’s now out-performing his FIP by more than half a point, suggesting that he’s been the beneficiary of some good luck, and that he is likely to regress moving forward. However, if we dig a little deeper, we can see how Gallardo has altered the way he pitches to adjust to his own physical decline.


This gives us a bit more insight on how Gallardo has evolved over the years. As his velocity has declined, he’s had to rely on the movement of his pitches more and more. Each year since his rookie season, he’s thrown his 4-seam fastball less frequently (if we ignore the slight uptick last season). Gallardo’s been increasing his slider usage since 2009. His two-seamer became a significant piece of his repertoire in 2011, and he now throws it as often as his four-seamer. That’s all well and good, but how has that affected his results? How has this adjustment in pitch selection helped him to maintain — nay, lower — his ERA?

The answer may be ground balls.

1_Gallado-GB rate

As Gallardo has gotten away from his four-seam fastball, he’s gradually turned into a groundball pitcher. If you can’t strike batters out, you had better be able to pitch to contact. Gallardo is becoming much more comfortable pitching to contact and trusting his middle infielders to finish the job. It also is worth noting that his HR:9 has been below 1.00 for three straight years, despite playing those seasons in Milwaukee and Arlington. Last year he allowed just one home run for every 2 games played.

Gallardo is, of course, not the first pitcher to make adjustments in his pitch selection to prolong his career, while maintaining an ERA significantly below his FIP. Gallardo’s former teammate Kyle Lohse quite famously turned his career around by swapping his four-seam fastball out for his two-seamer. From 2011, when Lohse really committed to the two-seamer, to 2014, Lohse’s excelled, with an ERA well below his FIP. Strikeouts are weighted so heavily with FIP that it tends to underrate control/pitch-to-contact pitchers.

Lohse joined the Brewers in 2013. The next year, Gallardo’s two-seam fastball usage spiked from 19.5% to 30.5%. It’d be interesting to find out how much, if any, impact Lohse had on Gallardo’s pitch selection.

Gallardo’s clean bill of health has allowed him to start 30+ games for 7 straight years. That’s an impressive achievement. He’s still only 29 years old, but all of those pitches have likely taken their toll on his arm, and a few miles per hour off of his fastball. It remains to be seen if he will continue to lose velocity as he ages, but for now, concerns of him fading into the abyss should be tempered, as he’s shown the ability to identify his problems and make the proper adjustments. There’s no reason to think that he won’t be able to continue to roll with the tide.

Zach Wheeler: Milwaukee Brewer


The Brewers reportedly sent the perpetually smiling, sometimes angry, Carlos Gomez to the Mets today in exchange for injured starting pitcher Zack Wheeler and 23 year-old infielder Wilmer Flores. The Brewers will have 4.5 years of control over each player, while Gomez has just a year and a half until Scott Boras cashes in on a monster free agent contract.

So, what should Brewers fans expect from their new Starter?

Wheeler has electric stuff. He throws his 95 mph fastball roughly two thirds of the time (50% 4-seamer, 20% 2-seamer). He also mixes in a quality slider and curve. His arsenal causes A LOT of whiffs, as he can maintain a nearly double-digit K:9. However, walks have been an issue for him. His control has improved since being drafted, but he still walks well over 3 batters per 9 innings, and until he can figure this out, he’ll top out as an above average, but middle of the rotation starter. If we dig a little deeper, we’ll see that his struggles are almost exclusive to left-handed batters.

Wheeler dominates righties. This is good because there are more right-handed batters than left-handed batters. Right-handers have posted just a .281 wOBA against Wheeler. His walk rate is a respectable 6.9% against RHB. However, when he faces lefties, those numbers explode. His walk rate more than doubles, to 13.9% against LHB. Lefties have posted a .336 wOBA against him for his young major league car- What’s that?

Oh. Well, nevermind then. Carry on.